Complaints

The Global Journal of Dental Specialty (GJDS) is committed to a fair, transparent, and accountable editorial process. The journal welcomes complaints from authors, reviewers, readers, and other stakeholders regarding editorial decisions, peer review, publication ethics, or journal management. All complaints are handled confidentially and in accordance with the recommendations of COPE and ICMJE.

Complaints may relate to:

• Editorial decisions.

• Peer-review procedures.

• Publication ethics or misconduct.

• Editorial delays.

• Conflicts of interest.

• Journal policies or services.

Appeals

Authors who believe that an editorial decision was made in error may submit a formal appeal to the Editorial Office. Appeals should include a clear explanation and any supporting evidence. Each appeal is reviewed independently by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated Editorial Board member who was not involved in the original decision.

Authors submitting an appeal should:

• Explain the reason for the appeal.

• Address the reviewers' comments.

• Provide supporting evidence where applicable.

• Submit the appeal within a reasonable time.

Editorial Responsibility

The Editorial Office investigates all complaints and appeals fairly, objectively, and confidentially. Where procedural errors or ethical concerns are identified, appropriate corrective action will be taken in accordance with COPE and ICMJE recommendations. The decision made after completion of the review process shall be considered final.